4554.
18,195 99%
4 tahun lalu
,jpeg/007/994/287/1280x720.1.jpg)
,jpeg/013/294/979/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/014/586/586/v2/320x180.219.jpg)
,jpeg/024/609/602/1280x720.17148472.jpg)
,jpeg/016/275/244/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/024/272/605/1280x720.17069668.jpg)
,jpeg/024/609/865/v2/320x180.210.jpg)
,jpeg/001/341/701/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/016/135/148/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/012/049/451/1280x720.8.jpg)
,jpeg/008/646/568/1280x720.4.jpg)
Komentar
6
I was actually being sarcastic. I have a knack for being able to insult people that goes right over their heads. You don't have to really "be" insulting or nasty. That requires no cleverness. With limited space here I said it because I don't care for De Niro, as an actor or in his offscreen comments. He's always been (frankly) a 'poor man's Al Pacino' lacking the latter actor's movie star good looks, refinement and polish, cuby. He was always kind of a cliche, but has really morphed into a parody of himself. All he does now is bash Trump. I don't care for him myself, but that's nearly all he does. Same thing with those women on the 'View' I used to see for a few minutes in the break room. Colbert's another one. SNL of course. That's the biggest joke of all because how can a show that's been a joke ITSELF since what, 1993 (?) be making fun of anything? It can't. Even if the show had remained funny like in the Dana Carvey era, you really can't spoof Trump because it's an on-going real life spoof. On a serious note, I think regular movies should, on occasion show a man masturbating and cumming. Why not? When he was younger Robert De Niro or Harvey Keitel would have been excellent in breaking that taboo, which it shouldn't be.